William K. Ince

Address:
Cameron LLP
818 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20006

Phone: (202) 293-4690
Fax: (202) 293-1877


POSITION

Senior Counsel

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE

Even after fifty years of international negotiations that have reduced barriers to world trade, many countries - including the United States - still maintain an array of laws and regulations that inhibit the free flow of goods and services. Believing that free and fair trade is essential to the economic well-being of peoples around the world, William K. Ince has spent the last thirty five years advising and representing primarily foreign exporters to the United States. His principal achievement for clients has been the avoidance of unwarranted antidumping and countervailing duties sought to be imposed as the result of trade investigations by U.S. government agencies, such as the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission. Among the products covered by these cases are cement, paper, lead metal, zinc, copper, steel, synthetic rubber, machine parts, automobiles, tomatoes, cucumbers, potatoes, grapes, raspberries, sugar, hogs, pork and canned pears. The countries targeted by the investigations include Australia, Brazil, Canada and Japan. By virtue of his representation of many Canadian clients, Mr. Ince has participated in more binational panel proceedings under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) than any other U.S. trade practitioner.

Mr. Ince manages the international trade practice group of Cameron LLP, and is the co-author and co-editor of the popular Manual for the Practice of U.S. International Trade Law, Kluwer Law International, 2001 (Co-editor and Co-author).

BAR AND COURT ADMISSIONS

District of Columbia, 1962

California, 1966

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, 1962

U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, 1962

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1982

U.S. Court of International Trade, 1982

PRACTICE